speterman: (pic#4649088)
speterman ([personal profile] speterman) wrote in [community profile] sortinghat_rp2012-09-12 09:22 pm

001 Important Questions

Am I the only one that questions what people were thinking as they made the first wands? Or Brooms? Or anything else for that matter? Who just woke up one morning and went "Wow, I think creating a wand would be a mighty fine thing to do?"

I mean, I guess that question kind of goes for any sort of invention, huh? I don't think I want to know what the first guy that discovered milk was thinking. This would be a thing I'd think about researching but I really don't want to end up thoroughly squicked out.

Are these seriously things no one thinks about?
preanimator: (unimpressed)

[personal profile] preanimator 2012-09-13 04:39 am (UTC)(link)
You might find some key to their motivations if you did the reading, but you would also probably know that there was no 'first person'. Neither the wand, nor the broom, were the invention of a single person. It isn't as though Mr. Richard Wand just spontaneously decided one day to carve a bit of wood into some interesting shape and try to channel magic through it.
preanimator: (hand behind head)

[personal profile] preanimator 2012-09-13 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
Trees were revered spiritually by our ancestors. They believed some of them to contain spirits or gods, and therefore pieces from the tree were held to have magical properties. Of course, actual wizards and witches found that certain types of wood DID enhance their magical abilities when held on their person, usually in the form of a small branch, or a larger one used as a staff, in much the same way as certain leaving from magical animals did the same, such as unicorn hair. It was hardly a big step to combine the two, and over time, this method has been refined into the modern wand making we know, though several non-European cultures still prefer staves or others magical foci. The carvings and polishing seem to be primarily aesthetic, and do not actually affect the magical properties of the wand.
preanimator: (broody)

[personal profile] preanimator 2012-09-13 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
I imagine they were thinking, 'Oh, wonderful, my spells are more powerful, how can I get more of this?' It's really not very complicated.

And I don't know about milk, I think it's disgusting. Probably someone with some sort of breast fixation.
preanimator: (hand behind head)

[personal profile] preanimator 2012-09-13 05:37 am (UTC)(link)
But it doesn't. Feeding cow's milk to an infant will kill them eventually, of malnourishment. Goat's milk is marginally better, but it's still not a proper substitute. Unless you think some human was comparing himself to a calf.
preanimator: (ravenclaw blue)

[personal profile] preanimator 2012-09-13 05:46 am (UTC)(link)
I'm aware of who you are, we're in the same House.

You might want to learn to be more specific, yes, except that I have found actually knowing things and not talking about them in vague, what if terms gets one mocked, case in point, our conversation. So for your own comfort and popularity, certainly continue pointless speculation without considering facts.
preanimator: (unimpressed)

[personal profile] preanimator 2012-09-13 05:52 am (UTC)(link)
I consider this conversation over. Do enjoy your day, Parker, and enjoy your milk.
preanimator: (Default)

[personal profile] preanimator 2012-09-13 06:47 am (UTC)(link)
[And sometime later, making it clear Herbert did actually close his journal and go off and do something else, there's a terse reply.]

It wasn't very funny.
preanimator: (neutral)

[personal profile] preanimator 2012-09-14 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
I'm still not sure what the point of this conversation is, anyway.
preanimator: (arrogant over the shoulder)

[personal profile] preanimator 2012-09-14 11:30 am (UTC)(link)
It's a waste of time. I have better things I could be doing - it isn't as if I'm learning anything from this.
preanimator: (Default)

[personal profile] preanimator 2012-09-15 10:21 am (UTC)(link)
I socialize with those who share my interests.

[That's ... pretty much one other person.]