Posts About How Hard Basic Math

[ihaveanappforthat]

[Someone has been spending a lot of his free time on one of the Slytherin common room sofas, keeping to himself and a couple of texts on Arithmancy. If it wasn't obvious by the dark circles under his eyes, he had not been sleeping enough and probably spending far too much time writing papers, testing theories and reading.]

I've taken notice to the startling reality that hardly anyone understands anything about Arithmancy other than it being a class, and those that do have a plethora of misconceptions about the study.

Bridget Wenlock first discovered the magical properties of seven - many might know how seven is generally a rather lucky number. Stir a potion seven times do a little jig and you've got one lucky batch of whatever you're making - that was me being facetious, I hardly advise dancing whilst making potions. That doesn't alter the fact that the number seven is used in potion making and even in other fields of magic aside from Arithmancy and Potions.



That being said, I am going to dispel a few of those misconceptions about Arithmancy:

First and foremost -- Divination and Arithmancy are not the same.

Divination is the field of magic that uses methods of divining the future or gathering insights into future events via the use of various rituals and tools.

Arithmancy is the field of magic that utilizes the magical properties of numbers, including predicting the future with numbers and numerology.

So someone may enjoy Divination and dislike Arithmancy, or the total opposite (I am in this statistic). As I state they are different -- I could spend paragraphs comparing apples and oranges but really no one wants that. ☺

We're now onto the next fallacy; lucky numbers, sounds easy enough. How wrong and boring. In Arithmancy the numbers used are single digit numbers: one to nine. Everything must always be simplified to single digits so it's not just lucky numbers that you see or use in your life over the years.

If your lucky number is, say fourteen. In Arithmancy your lucky number would be five;
14
1+4 = 5

No two digit numbers, you must always add.

14 = ☹

1+4 = 5


Now, there isn't just one chart you can use to assign number to letters; there are two. Yes, I said two.

There is the Agrippan Method (Also known as the Pythagorian Method) which is believed to be discovered by Cornelius Agrippa, a german wizard and philosopher. There are some texts on him in the library, they're quite interesting if you ever are bored! He divided the Latin alphabet and gave each number a value from one to nine.




The second method is Chaldean Method. Instead of being based off of Latin and the other Romance Languages, it is based off Arabic languages. It also does not assign the value nine to any letter of the alphabet. It is, however, the same in that it you gather the sum of values and then that sum is reduced for a final number.




This is where things are going to get a bit biased, please forgive me in advance.

Many will say that the future is unchangeable, that it is already predetermined. The future is ever changing, quite a few would disagree with me, say that it is a preset destination that everyone will come to - but those people think inside the box. The future is what you make of it. As Rene Descartes said -- Mind over matter - cogito ergo sum: I think, therefore I am. That is how I look at the future, it exists however we make it to.

I see Arithmancy as a fluid field of magic, so many factors and possibilities affecting it.

Onto my theory for the matter:

As I mentioned earlier, it is a mix of science and magic.

A well known law in physics is Newton's Third Law, wherein he states that "for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." This of course was related to gravity but in all numbers there seems to be truth to this. If seven is an extremely magical and lucky number there must be an opposite. Theoretically this must be true if we look at Newton's laws and apply them to mathematics.

I'm not generally a pessimist, but I cannot be the only one raising an eyebrow at all the positivity in Arithmancy.

Comments

[3potionproblem]

That doesn't necessarily validate the other. Yes, there is a luck potion but potions are about making things possible, not acting on the probable or likely. Just because there is a potion that can make one appear lucky it does not mean that luck outside of magic exists as Arithmancy would suggest.

[ihaveanappforthat]

The number seven has been proven to cause favourable outcomes throughout magic. I have texts on the matter, if you must borrow them.

In all honesty I don't care about luck, whether or not it exists. I care about solving problems, and the fact that there is only positive in Arithmancy is a problem to me. It doesn't add up.

Was there another point to this other than to debate with me over what I may or may not believe in?

[3potionproblem]

Just curious.

[ihaveanappforthat]

I see.

Well to answer the question you're not asking: I'm trying to keep my mind busy.

[3potionproblem]

Seems so.

You would make a good Arithmancy professor.

[ihaveanappforthat]

[Someone has been throwing too much of a tantrum to actually expect a compliment. Sherlock you should see the Slytherin common room.]

Thank you.

[Okay, so someone might still need a juice box and a nap but Sherlock is a lot better at not making Moriarty want to throw books at people.]

Teaching could be interesting.

[3potionproblem]

You should think about that as a profession. Then you could research all you want on the side.

[ihaveanappforthat]

Perhaps.

It would get boring quickly once the novelty wore off.

[3potionproblem]

New students every year. Might provide something of interest.

[ihaveanappforthat]

Ordinary students. Could make it spiral into tedium quickly.

[3potionproblem]

We're here.

There might be others like us.

[ihaveanappforthat]

Why is this such an interest to you?

[Back to wanting to throw a book at your face, Holmes.]

[3potionproblem]

It's not really. I just know you'd said you hadn't given much thought into after graduation.

[ihaveanappforthat]

I see. I'll think about it.

[3potionproblem]

Good.

I think Professor Moriarty has a nice ring to it.

[ihaveanappforthat]

I'm not in the mood for stupid petty games, Sherlock.

[Woah, who ever thought Moriarty would say that.]

Why are you so interested in something that is meaningless to you and overly complimenting me?

You already apologized.

[Yep, there would be some book face action if Sherlock were there.]

[3potionproblem]

I'm not playing any games.

And I'm certainly not apologizing.

[ihaveanappforthat]

Then what are you doing?

[3potionproblem]

Making conversation. Not everything has to have an ulterior motive.

[ihaveanappforthat]

Fair enough. I'm not much for conversation at the moment. I wanted to get others' input before I started thinking of other things.

But yes, I'll look into it maybe.

[3potionproblem]

Alright.

[filter]

[ihaveanappforthat]

[There is a long silence, no reply... him probably throwing a tantrum at Arthur..]

I don't like seeing you unhappy. I appreciate you.

[Moriarty's rare form of an apology, something oddly soft and personal to it. Giving personal thoughts away so openly and allowing attack when he's typically a secretive person…]

I'll look into it, yeah.

[filter]

[3potionproblem]

Do what you like, Jim.